|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOCUS
roadmap proposal for the planning of "Security Research 2035" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Towards a
trans-disciplinary security research paradigm |
|
|
|
This is
the structural overview page of the FOCUS roadmap. This roadmap is a proposal
for planning for Security Research in a 2035 time frame based on the results
of multiple scenario foresight as conducted in the FOCUS project. The roadmap
is calibrated both towards five reference scenarios. These were integrated
from sets of scenarios for future EU roles as a comprehensive security
provider and of alternative futures for Security Research to support those
roles, e.g. by capabiltiy development, training, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this
entry page is to show the overall structure of the roadmap and to provide
some entry ponits for navigating through and working with the roadmap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The FOCUS roadmap
refects the project's main conclusions for "Security Research
2035," lead by the project's idea to make a contribution to a
trans-disciplinary security research paradigm that develops based on
sustainable output of security research projects in late FP7, in Horizon
2020, and beyond. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOCUS
IT-based Knolwedge Platform |
|
The roadmap is based
on an overall integration of results form FOCUS scenario foresight work. To
make the core roadmap a standalone document, major content from FOCUS
deliverables has been included in the roadmap structure/sub-pages (and not
just been hyperlinked). Continuative information has been included via
hyperlinks to other parts of the FOCUS IT-based Knowledge Platform, such as
scenario wikis or the European Security Research Glossary wiki. Please note that some wiki and other content may be restricted
and only be accessible with login credentials. |
|
|
|
|
|
FOCUS
method |
|
Scenario foresight
in FOCUS included a broad number of different types of experts and
stakeholders, and a variety of scenario information (such as online and
on-site questionnaires, new social media information, workshops, studies,
related projects’ results, etc.). In total (online and on site), FOCUS
involved more than 600 external experts/stakeholders from more than 20
countries, both within and beyond the EU. Experts were identified in horizon
scanning, in scanning of related projects, and by using partners’ lists of
experts. Further experts were added based on project-related communication
and turnout for project events. Participating experts represented EU bodies,
national federal bodies and international bodies, industry, first responder
organizations, think tanks, universities, NGOs, and other sectors. As far as
its on-site work is concerned, FOCUS held more than 40 external and more than
30 internal foresight workshops. |
|
|
|
|
|
As
shown in the the knowledge landscape overview below, the roadmap is
structured along two dimensions, blending elements from classical technology
roadmapping with elements of a balanced scorecard: |
|
|
1. A horizontal dimension (time line - immediate
action, short-term, mid-term, long-term) |
|
|
Reference
scenarios |
|
2. A vertical
dimension. The vertical dimension is divided into two parts: |
|
|
|
2a. Reference
scenario aspects of the planning for "Security Research 2035" -
these are "pull" factors, where futuristic scenarios require
certain types and efforts of security research; |
|
|
2b. General aspects
of the planning for "Security Research 2035" - these are
"push" factors, where certain general requirements for and
expectations from security research drive the future development of that
field of research. |
|
|
|
|
|
European
Security Research Glossary |
|
Abbreviations
and concepts relevant for the roadmap are explained in the FOCUS project's
European Security (Research) Glossary (ESG) |
|
|
|
The
ESG explains acronyms and terms (with references) relevant for EU security
and for the planning of security research in a 2035 time frame, as covered by
the FOCUS project. Glossary content has been compiled from both FOCUS
deliverables and documents and supporting desktop research. FOCUS collected
and developed these basic glossary on security research to promote a common
understanding on the subject for use by the public, authorities, researchers
and practitioners. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2035 |
|
|
|
REFERENCE SCENARIO ASPECTS OF "SECURITY RESEARCH 2035"
PLANNING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial end-users
assessments and recommendations |
|
Scenario drivers |
|
Emerging key themes |
|
Requirements identified
from related projects |
|
EU requirements |
|
|
|
Comprehensive
approach |
|
|
|
Thematic scenarios for
"EU 2035" security roles |
|
Thematic scenarios for
"Security Research 2035" to support those roles |
|
Reference
scenario 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural disasters
and global environmental change |
|
|
|
|
Reference scenario 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical
infrastructure and supply chain protection |
|
|
|
|
Reference
scenario 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EU as a
global actor based on the wider Petersberg tasks |
|
|
|
|
Reference
scenario 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EU internal
framework (& EU homeland security) |
|
|
|
|
Reference
scenario 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT-based
Knowledge Platform for scenario foresight/planning |
|
|
Supporting
tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
2035 |
|
|
|
GENERAL ASPECTS OF "SECURITY RESEARCH 2035" PLANNING |
|
FOCUS conclusions for
future Security Research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concept of security in/of the EU |
|
|
|
|
|
Current emerging key themes |
|
Futuristic
security research requirements identified from related projects |
|
Futuristic
security research requirements from EU Directorates General and Agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
approach, including security governance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-cutting
aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Education & training curriculum aspects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usable Security
Research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Security
Research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System of
Security Research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EU-U.S. research collaboration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASPECTS FOR INITIAL
AND CONTINOUS CONSIDERATION |
|
SHORT TERM |
MID TERM |
LONG TERM |
|
REFERENCE SCENARIO PLANNING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|